🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in a collective professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "expedite". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" influence how content are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decrease substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and human," she explained. "Currently, the bro-coded version was forceful and confident - similar to a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after one week, stating "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive results. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where the same content by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Evolving Environment

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."